THE FACTOR “CULTURE” IN THE GLOBAL SOCIAL SYSTEM
THE FACTOR “CULTURE” IN THE GLOBAL SOCIAL SYSTEM
THE FACTOR “CULTURE” IN THE GLOBAL SOCIAL SYSTEM
ASSUMPTIONS OF EUROPIAN CULTURAL COOPERATION
INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL RELATIONS AND THE TRANSFORMING WORLD
A division of cultural events to high and low, as well as differences
between the established and popular culture, are subject to a number
of interpretations of cultural theories. The right-wing critical thought
defended the “real” culture from the crude culture of the lower
social classes, while the leftists found mass culture positive for its
democratization. Thanks to the impact of the global media, position
of music occupies a high place in the hierarchy of industry and market
culture. The opposed relationship of art and popular music is being
relativized in terms of class identification. The ideology of taste, which
is also related to the possession of a larger or smaller cultural capital,
has adapted to the requirements of populism and market. Agreeing to
concessions is a kind of democratization of elite musical forms (for
example opera), and movement of various musical forms in the system
of two-way (higher / lower) and circular (from one form to another)
forms representing both resistance and compliance in mutual encounter
and permeation of classical and popular music, both in practice and
in theory. With the exception of the avant-garde “outages” in classical
music or lowest genres of folk, all other types of music (classical, jazz,
rock, pop, folk) have found some sort of balance in their relationship.
Along with the general crisis of the spirit of criticism, this certainly
contributed to value relativism, as one of the essential features of
popular culture.
This paper examines contemporary interpretations of creativity and
instrumentalisation of the concept itself, both in neoliberal discourse
and in public policies that have become the driver of ever deeper
society inequalities. A review of divergent production research from
the second half of the 20th century, as the foundation of all further
psychological studies, and the analysis of implicit social agendas
reveal three controversial points of theoretical starting points in which
creativity was viewed exclusively as adaptive ability validated by the
product – the outcome of individual achievement. A response to this
simplified concept of creativity has arrived from researchers focused
on emerging processes within the collective. In new studies, they have
confirmed the primacy of social interaction in a cognitive development,
shifting the research focus from adaptive to transformative function,
from productivity to processuality, from individual to group level of
creativity. Therefore, at this moment, it seems to be fully justified to
examine creativity in the light of wider social changes, considering the
conditions of Castoriadis’s concept of radical imagination, especially
because the neglected features of creativity are a common resource, as
well as a requirement of change.
In this paper, for the first time in national historiography, the life and
work of Olga Kešeljević Barbezat, an art historian and actress, are dealt
with in more detail. Having arrived in Paris in 1936 with the intention
to defend her PhD thesis in art history, she established relations with a
circle of Yugoslav artists: Ljubica Cuca Sokić, Ivan Tabaković, Bora
Baruh, Petar Lubarda etc. During the Second World War she married
Mark Barbezat, a young intellectual who would soon launch L’Arbalète,
the publishing house well-known for the works of Jean Genet, Antonin
Artaud, Albert Camus, Lana Leclercq, Sartre, Eluard etc. Considering
the published correspondence between Barbezat and Genet, numerous
dedications in the books owned by the Barbezat family, Olgaʼs portraits
painted by some of the most influential Serbian twentieth-century
artists, the testimonies of the successors of their families, postcards
and letters sent to painter Nedeljko Gvozdenović (kept in the Archive
of SASA in Belgrade), as well as other material traces, this paper
discusses the role of Olga Kešeljević Barbezat on the cultural scene
of France, as well as the intelectual relations she had with the Serbian
artists whose works were part of the Barbezat art collection. At the
same time, knowing that the family heritage was put up for auction in
2016, after Olga Kešeljevićʼs death in December 2015, it is important
to think about the availability of any new material and possibly existing
personal correspondence with Serbian artists that would contribute to
the results of this research in the future.
In an effort to determine certain basic principles of Visual Economy,
it is natural and quite logical to first consider it in the context of
traditional media. This implies that we will have a smaller number of
media available, which enables us to better understand and define the
problems they deal with. In its further structuring and defining, a wide
range of the media and new visual aspects and possibilities that are
available to us in the modern age can be very helpful. Anthropologist
Deborah Pool defines the Visual Economy as a political, economic and
social matrix in which photos operate, and defines their production,
circulation, consumption and possession. Before any attempt to
determine visual economy framework, it is necessary to consider the
crucial and revolutionary role of the Internet today. The economy and
all the other phenomena that accompany it are inevitably included in
this vast network of computers. Also, visual perception is unimaginable
outside the context of the Internet. Even if we tried to do this we
would weave into that network, or at least we would feel something
was missing and that the whole was not completely rounded up. In
its primary sense, the Internet Economy refers to the basic economic
qualities of the Internet, and how the Internet service providers share
costs and provide services. However, many of the issues that appear in
the Internet Economy look similar to those in the traditional industrial
economy. The Internet Economy covers more and more areas of
the economy, and at the same time, every industry is not under the
influence of the Internet in the same scope. This secondary significance,
which is more important to us, refers to visual content on the Internet
(photos, pictures, films, etc.) and their consumption and affect on
the consumers from different cultures. Visual Economy is in some
way connected with Visual Culture, and there are many touch points
with Visual Anthropology. This is especially expressed in the field of
cinematography, which is a rich field for research, from both visual and
economic aspect.
Address: Rige od Fere 4, Beograd
Phone: +381 11 2637 565
Fax: +381 11 2638 941
Еmail: info@zaprokul.org.rs
